Skip to content
    • About DealAI
    • Deal AI 2025 Status Check
    • DealAI Advertising Rates & Sponsored Post Rates
    • DealAI History

Deal AI – Deals, Funding, Acquisitions & Mergers in AI

  • Understanding why OpenAI delayed its IPO

    June 25th, 2026

    There are strong rumors that OpenAI is delaying its IPO to 2027 -> OpenAI Leans Toward Holding Up I.P.O. Until Next Year – The New York Times

    Ostensibly, the reason for the delay is that OpenAI’s IPO might not meet Sam Altman’s $1 Trillion OpenAI valuation target.

    On the surface this seems peculiar as SpaceX is sitting at a $2 Trillion valuation.

    1. SpaceX is an also ran in the AI wars. xAI is currently more of an inference rental company than an actual AI company.

    So, why is OpenAI afraid of missing its $1 Trillion valuation target?

    Dig deeper and some interesting data points emerge.

    SpaceX’s IPO is not really going as well as everyone in AI would like

    Currently, SpaceX sits at $2 Trillion valuation with

    1. Stock at $151, very close to the price it opened at
    2. The Elon Musk crazy factor is not helping SpaceX the way it helps Tesla
      • There were people throwing around $5 trillion and $8 trillion figures
    3. Stock Market in turmoil because of US war on Iran and Russian war on Ukraine
    4. AI Bubble seems more and more delicate
    5. Yen Carry Trade under massive pressure
    6. Effects of US war on Iran and closure of Strait of Hormuz still not fully understood
    7. SpaceX stock very far from its all-time high of $225

    Sam Altman and OpenAI do not have the Elon Musk fan club and they do not have the Data Centers in Space story. They certainly don’t have the shamelessness to claim the Total Addressable Market is $38 trillion.

    So, it is quite possible that OpenAI fails to maintain a $1 Trillion valuation on going public.

    As the AI companies are, at some level, story stocks – It would be absolutely unacceptable for OpenAI to miss $1 Trillion valuation. The AI story has no room for downs. Stock must only go up.

    Amount of Liquidity is Limited

    Because of

    1. SpaceX IPO and SpaceX debt raise
    2. Google debt raise and Google selling bonds
    3. Meta selling bonds
    4. Oracle selling bonds
    5. Many AI companies raising money

    The amount of available market liquidity is very limited. It is not an accident that Google raised a massive amount of money right before SpaceX and OpenAI and Anthropic IPOs.

    The large tech companies are using every means possible to fight Anthropic and OpenAI.

    Raising massive amounts of money just before AI company IPOs and thereby making it hard for Anthropic and OpenAI IPOs to do well is definitely a strategic and negative move by Google.

    Anthropic IPO might split AI funds

    SpaceX has already raised $75 billion and taken up some of the funds allocated by investors and retail investors to AI.

    If both Anthropic and OpenAI IPO this year, the amount of funds left for AI investments might get split between the two IPOs and cause both IPOs to be lackluster.

    In fact, there might not even be enough funds left for one spectacular AI IPO.

    OpenAI and Anthropic are both at Inflection Points

    Open AI and Anthropic are both at points where

    1. They are finally on the verge of profitability
    2. Revenue continues to increase at absurd rates
    3. They have enough funds to be able to wait
    4. Their financial picture might improve massively within the next 6 to 12 months
    5. They might, within 6 to 12 months, become much more palatable to the general investor population
    6. A major AI development might skyrocket valuation of the two companies (or of one)
    7. A killer AI app for every day customers might make the entire AI landscape very positive and upbeat

    Given the earlier factors, it becomes more important for Open AI and Anthropic to have a healthy financial outlook and be more advanced in their evolution as a business.

    Wild Card – One or both of Anthropic and OpenAI might be close to beating out Google, Meta/Facebook, Amazon permanently

    Given the rate at which researchers are running away from Google DeepMind to Anthropic and OpenAI.

    Given that xAI has lost all its non Elon founders. Basically all the AI geniuses are gone.

    Given that Meta/Facebook and Amazon are so far behind they might as well be running a different race.

    It might be that within 12 to 24 months it’s a two horse race. At that point the ENTIRETY of AI money would go to OpenAI and Anthropic.

    Perhaps there is some data OpenAI sees which is telling it to wait until 2027.

    Perhaps this is the same data that is causing all the top Google AI researchers to run away to Anthropic and OpenAI.

  • Everyone is behaving as if Anthropic and OpenAI are set to become the Coke and Pepsi of AI

    June 22nd, 2026

    In 2021 to 2025, most companies had begun to behave as if AI was the guaranteed future.

    1. We saw large established technology companies such as Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta/Facebook start spending insane amounts on AI infrastructure
    2. This has increased (shockingly) with each of Amazon, Google, Microsoft, Meta/Facebook spending $150 to $200 billion a year on AI infrastructure

    Basically, these companies were behaving as if it is a certainty that AI will eat the world. Not just the way the Internet ate the world, but in a much more comprehensive way.

    Now, in mid 2026 Everyone seems to believe Anthropic and Open AI are set to become the two biggest and only winners of AI

    Please Note: I mean Core AI. I’m not saying no one else will make money from AI. Nor am I saying everyone else will die. Just that it seems the core AI race seems to be won already by Anthropic and Open AI

    There are some signs of this

    1. The US Government has stepped in to block Anthropic from selling Mythic and Fable outside the US, effectively saying – you’re too far ahead of everyone else
      • Amazon, which owns between 10% to 20% of Anthropic, stepped in to warn the US Government
      • There were talks for many days between Amazon CEO Andy Jassy and the US Government
    2. Satya Nadella of Microsoft is talking about AI needing to be in the hands of users and companies. That everything being in the hands of Anthropic and OpenAI is dangerous
    3. Microsoft owns 27% of Open AI
    4. It’s interesting and scary that Amazon are so scared of Anthropic that despite Amazon owning 10% to 20% of Anthropic they are willing to sabotage it
    5. It’s even more interesting that Microsoft are so scared of OpenAI that despite owning 27% of it, Microsoft is warning about dangers of an Anthropic + Open AI duopoly in AI

    Large technology companies only run to the Government if they feel there is the danger of formation of a monopoly other than their own.

    Basically, Microsoft and Amazon feel very strongly that Anthropic and OpenAI might get so far ahead that no one else can catch up. Now these large technology monopolies are crying about fairness and national security.

    What does this tell us about the AI race and Anthropic and OpenAI’s place in it?

    1. Firstly, as far as Microsoft and Amazon are concerned, Anthropic and OpenAI are too far ahead to compete with on fair grounds
    2. Secondly, pulling in US Government is the ultimate trump card
      • You do not use it unless there is no other path forward

    The large technology companies are very clearly signaling – AI race is over/almost over. Anthropic and OpenAI are so far ahead that we cannot catch them.

    The AI Experts are voting with their feet

    Whereas Microsoft have become also-rans in the AI LLM Wars. Whereas Meta/Facebook and Amazon do not even register in the AI LLM Wars any more.

    Google was supposed to still have a good shot.

    That hypothesis seems toast as arguably 2 of the top 5 AI minds in Google departed on the same day

    1. John Jumper, co-winner of the Nobel Prize with Demis Hassabis, left Google DeepMind for Anthropic
    2. Noam Shazeer, one of the lead authors of ‘All You Need is Attention’ left Google Deepmind for Open AI
      • That’s the paper that introduced the transformer architecture and made today’s AI boom possible
      • One of the 3 most cited papers of this century

    We are talking about the very best of the best. Leaving the company they spent most of their careers at.

    Noam Shazeer had already sold Character.AI to Google for $$2.7 billion and made between $750 million to $1 Billion.

    These top of the top researchers would only leave Google if they felt Google had very little chance of overtaking Anthropic and Open AI.

  • Advertising General Intelligence – The AGI we are getting is not the AGI we were promised

    November 29th, 2025

    Thanks to Tibor -> Tibor Blaho on X: “ChatGPT Android app 1.2025.329 beta includes new references to an “ads feature” with “bazaar content”, “search ad” and “search ads carousel” https://t.co/BdHOJIQHmA” / X

    We now know that ChatGPT will soon be adding Advertising to ChatGPT.

    ***

    AGI aka AdGI -> Advertising General Intelligence

    Instead of Artificial General Intelligence where AI matches human intelligence across all/most domains of human intelligence, we will be getting Advertising General Intelligence.

    Advertising General Intelligence -> ChatGPT and other AI chatbots and AI systems will be giving answers based on what leads to advertising revenue.

    What is Advertising General Intelligence (AGI aka AdGI)

    Advertising General Intelligence is where the AI system adjusts and adapts its answers based on what will generate revenue and profits for the company which owns and controls the AI system.

    We see this with Search where Google Search is a great example of the almost complete destruction of the utility and quality of the product to make money.

    We also see this with Facebook where Facebook/Meta has massively degraded the quality of the Facebook Feed to sell advertising.

    The same thing in ChatGPT and other AI systems will take us away from the quest for Artificial General Intelligence and towards Advertising General Intelligence.

    Instead of trying to match humans across all intelligences, AI systems will try and match Google Search and Facebook Feed in how smart it can be in generating clicks and revenue.

    Thanks to Bleeping Computer -> https://www.bleepingcomputer.com/news/artificial-intelligence/leak-confirms-openai-is-preparing-ads-on-chatgpt-for-public-roll-out/

    DealAI’s earlier post on AdGI -> OpenAI testing ‘Ads’ inside ChatGPT – Deal AI – Deals, Funding, Acquisitions & Mergers in AI

  • OpenAI testing ‘Ads’ inside ChatGPT

    November 29th, 2025

    Bleeping Computer has the scoop -> Leak confirms OpenAI is preparing ads on ChatGPT for public roll out

    Tibor on X spotted that ChatGPT’s latest Android App includes references to an Ads Feature, with

    1. Bazar Content
    2. Search Ad
    3. Search Ads Carousel

    Reference -> x.com/btibor91/status/1994714152636690834

  • China’s Moonshot AI raising a few hundred million dollars at $4 Billion Valuation

    November 21st, 2025

    WSJ Reports that Moonshot AI (maker of Kimi AI Models) is raising funds at a $4 Billion Valuation

    Link -> https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/chinas-moonshot-ai-raising-fresh-funds-that-could-value-it-at-about-4-billion-20562245?st=opD5kf&reflink=desktopwebshare_permalink

    WSJ also reports that Moonshot AI will aim for an IPO in the 2nd half of 2026

    Details on Moonshot AI’s Fund Raising and 2026 Potential IPO

    1. Raising $300 Million or more at a $4 Billion valuation
    2. Investors include Existing shareholder Tencent
    3. Moonshot AI aims to close the round by end of 2025
    4. Moonshot tells WSJ that they do not have any timeline for an IPO
      • So they are denying WSJ’s claim of 2nd half of 2026 IPO
      • That usually means WSJ got it right
    5. Existing backers include Tencent, Alibaba Group, and VC firm HongShan Capital
    6. Moonshot’s earlier Series B round was August 2024. It raised $300 million from Tencent and VC Capital firm Gaorong Capital

  • LLMs vs World Models – Understanding why Yann LeCun and other top AI researchers are moving from Large Language Models to World Models

    November 19th, 2025

    What are Large Language Models?

    Large Language Models are AI models that process billions of words and generate predictions in the form of text output.

    They are great for text focused tasks such as – Coding, Translation, Legal Research, Editing, Debugging, Documenting.

    What are World Models?

    World Models are AI models that more closely capture how humans view the world. Instead of just text, they take in a variety of input including video, music, spatial relationships, etc.

    Whereas LLMs take billions of data points that are all text, World Models can take billions of data points of inputs of different modes (not just text).

    Yann LeCun explains it well when he says that it is like viewing the world as Babies do and building a model of the world based on that approach.

    Will adding more and more ‘compute’ and ‘resources’ to LLMs enable them to achieve Artificial General Intelligence (AGI)?

    There is a very strong divide

    1. Most companies built on LLMs think that just by adding more and more compute resources and using more and more data points, LLMs can achieve Artificial General Intelligence
    2. Many AI researchers are beginning to agree with Yann LeCun who feels that LLMs can never reach Artificial General Intelligence

    Personally, at Deal AI, we feel that expecting LLMs to achieve AGI is a dream. Yes, the insane amounts of investment into LLM based companies leads to a state where everyone WISHES that LLMs could achieve AGI.

    Reality is that wishful thinking is not going to lead to AGI and Super Intelligence. We need World Models and even more advanced Models to start building to AGI and SI (Super Intelligence).

    Why do some researchers, including one of the Godfathers of AI, Yann LeCun, think LLMs will never lead to AGI or Super Intelligence?

    Reference: Life after Meta for Yann LeCun – Fast Company

    A very good article and well worth reading. These two paragraphs are super key ->

     LeCun has been critical of that approach (LLMs to achieve AGI), and doubts that it has produced AI that truly reasons, rather than just detects patterns and predicts the next word or pixel in a sequence. 

    LeCun has called for more foundational research on alternate paths that could more quickly lead to AI models that can match or exceed human intelligence. His recent research has focused on “world modeling”—developing AI systems capable of quickly learning about the physical world as human babies do. 

    This is the crux -> LLMs just detect patterns and predict the next word or pixel in a sequence.

    No matter whether you feed a LLM billions of words or trillions of words, it is just a Prediction Engine. It is not AGI or Super Intelligence.

    Why we think LLMs are a Dead End as regards Artificial General Intelligence and Super Intelligence

    To keep their massive valuations. To keep getting funding. To help the Founders and Early Investors to cash out. To get IPOs and hand over the bag to retail bagholders.

    All the existing Investors and CEOs in AI companies desperately need to sell the Dream that LLMs will lead to AGI and Super Intelligence and unbelievable levels of wealth for everyone.

    Reality does not care whether or not AI investors and AI CEOs can get their cash and exit before the game of musical chairs stops.

    Reality is that LLMs have not shown any signs of being close to AGI. LLMs are very impressive for tasks that are suited to Prediction Engines and Guessing Engines. They have had no ‘human spark’ and no actual sparks of intelligence.

    Why we think World Models have a lot more promise and are far likelier to lead to Artificial General Intelligence and Super Intelligence

    In the end, the only path to Artificial General Intelligence and Super Intelligence is to have a Processing Engine that takes in multiple types of data (like the human senses do), and which processes these data streams as fast or faster than the human brain.

    Text only input can never catch the human brain because the human brain is getting sight, sound, touch, and other sensory data.

    Furthermore, the human brain is processing all of these together, in real time and in combination.

    While you could argue that a ‘supercomputer’ with tens of thousands of Nvidia GPUs or AI Chips could try and reach the complexity and processing power of the human brain, there is no way LLMs with a single data source (just words) could match the uniqueness of the human brain processing data from multiple senses at the same time.

  • Australian AI Data Center Startup, Firmus, triples its valuation from $2 Billion to $6 Billion in 2 months

    November 19th, 2025

    You are not reading that wrong. Firmus’ valuation has grown from $2 Billion to $6 Billion in 2 months.

    Reference: Firmus raises another $500 million for its AI data centres

    Reference: Nvidia-backed Australian AI company Firmus raises $325 million | Reuters

    That’s actually not even the most fascinating thing about Firmus. Smart Company Australia has this gold nugget about Firmus’ co-founder Oliver Curtis ->

    The son of mining and banking exec Nick Curtis, Oliver became infamous in 2016 when, as a 30-year-old stockbroker, he was sentenced to two years’ imprisonment for an insider trading scam with a close friend that netted them just $1.43 million. He served 12 months before being released in 2017.

    Nothing says ‘totally justified that we tripled the company’s valuation to $6 billion in 2 months’ like one of the co-founders having spent a year in jail for insider trading.

    Firmus’ Funding Rounds

    1. Seed Round -> Uniknown investment at an Unknown Valuation
      • We do know that co-founder Oliver Curtis invested $250,000
    2. 2024 -> Valued at $81 Million. No details on whether funds were raised in 2024
    3. Aug 2025 -> $330 Million raised at a $2 Billion valuation from Nvidia
    4. Nov 2025 -> $500 Million raised at a $6 Billion valuation

    The latest $500 Million is for the national rollout of Project Southgate. Project Southgate is hoping to deliver AI Factory deployments of up to 1.6 gigawatts by 2028.

    We are definitely not in an AI Bubble

    Under normal circumstances people would be super reluctant to invest in someone who spent a year in jail for Insider Trading (for a paltry $1.4 million gain).

    It’s absolutely nuts that not only are people investing in a company with a co-founder that spent time in jail for insider trading, they also raised its valuation from $2 billion to $6 billion in Two Months.

    Firmus plans to IPO in 2026. So it might be that the investors think the Australian public or the American public will be bailing them out.

    Interesting Firmus History

    Firmus was founded in 2019 by Oliver Curtis, Tim Rosenfield and Jonathan Levee, and originally focused on bitcoin mining.

    The company pivoted to what it calls “green AI factories” somewhere between 2019 and 2024.

  • Microsoft & Open AI Deal Details – How the Open AI & Microsoft Deal is arranged

    November 19th, 2025

    Microsoft & Open AI Deal Details – Executive Summary

    Kakashii (Profile / X i.e. https://x.com/kakashiii111) has a really good write up and the key points are ->

    1. Microsoft gets 27% equity stake in Open AI
      • Which is absolutely massive
      • Microsoft’s stake in Open AI is, in theory, worth $127 Billion
      • Its value can go higher as OpenAI valuation keeps getting boosted by the AI Bubble
    2. Secured Exclusive IP rights and Azure API usage until ‘AGI’
      • Please Note: Many top AI researchers like Yann LeCun think LLMs cannot lead to Artificial General Intelligence (we agree)
      • Now that definition of AGI will be specified by an independent 3rd party panel, this means that Microsoft has Open AI locked up for a very long time (Open AI can’t just hand wave and claim AGI has been achieved)
      • We really don’t see OpenAI achieving AGI using LLMs and its current approach
    3. Microsoft’s IP rights to research will remain in effect until AGI, or through 2030
      • This is a bigger win for Microsoft than people realize
    4. Any OpenAI API based products developed with 3rd parties must remain exclusive to Azure
    5. Microsoft can collaborate with any other AI lab
    6. The 20/80 revenue share arrangement remains in place until AGI
    7. Open AI agreed to $250 billion worth of Azure service commitments
    8. Microsoft does not have the right of first refusal
      • At the same time -> API products must run exclusively on Azure

    It really does seem Microsoft was in a very strong position as this deal is heavily tilted in favor of Microsoft.

    Microsoft & Open AI History I – Learning from its Mistake with investing in Facebook

    When Microsoft invested $240 million in Facebook at a $15 billion valuation, they took a measly 1.9% equity.

    This was a massive mistake. Taking a sizeable amount of equity would have been priceless. Satya Nadella obviously learned from that mistake.

    For those who are older, Microsoft made the same mistake with Apple. IYKYK.

    Microsoft & Open AI History II – The Right Approach with Investing in AI

    The original Microsoft and Open AI deal is quite marvelous (for Microsoft)

    1. It made Microsoft one of the frontrunners in AI Cloud (arguably #1)
    2. It gave Microsoft a significant equity share in OpenAI
    3. It gave Microsoft revenue share
    4. If OpenAI fails, then Microsoft gets the IP
      • Please Note: We have to verify the accuracy of this
    5. It was done very early and multiple times i.e. in both Series A and Series B
      • So Microsoft kept its share intact

    This was a masterful deal and Microsoft and Mr. Satya Nadella should get a lot of credit for this.

    Microsoft & Open AI Deal – Series A & Series B

    Series A on July 22nd, 2019 -> $1 Billion invested by Microsoft and Matthew Brown Companies at an Unknown Valuation

    Series B on Jan 23rd, 2023 -> $10 Billion invested by Microsoft and other investors at a $27 Billion Valuation.

    These two investments meant that even after Series B Microsoft had 32.5% equity. More importantly, it means that even now, in Nov 2025, Microsoft still has 27% equity in Open AI and Open AI is wedded to Azure.

    Microsoft & Open AI Deal – Current Deal Setup

    Please see the first section of this post for more details. The key points are

    1. Microsoft has 27% Equity in Open AI
    2. Open AI has $250 billion in commitments to Azure
    3. Open AI has committed that all API based products will use Azure

    It’s one heck of a deal for Microsoft.

    From OpenAI’s perspective you could argue that Microsoft’s investments in 2019 and 2013 were key to Open AI becoming what it is.

  • Godfather of AI Yann LeCun leaving Meta to start new AI Startup. Meta/Facebook to partner with Yann LeCun

    November 19th, 2025

    Bloomberg has confirmed the rumors that Yann LeCun, one of the Godfathers of AI and Turing Award Winner, is leaving Facebook/Meta and starting his own AI startup, focused on World Models.

    Bloomberg -> https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-11-19/meta-ai-s-lecun-to-announce-exit-startup-as-soon-as-this-week

    The interesting twist is that Facebook/Meta say that it will be partnering with Yann LeCun on his new startup.

    The information is also sharing details -> Yann LeCun to Leave Meta to Form New AI Startup — The Information

    Thoughts on Yann LeCun leaving Facebook and starting his own AI startup focused on World Models

    There are so many interesting things to think about

    1. Lots of people leaving Facebook.
      • Former Yann LeCun student and PyTorch co-founder Chintala also left Facebook (for Thinking Machines Lab)
    2. Yann LeCun leaving Facebook/Meta is a massive loss. Worth far more than the AI researchers Zuckerberg has been handing $100 million a year contracts to
    3. Yann LeCun leaving might have included these four aspects
      • New AI researchers being given insane salaries at Facebook AI Labs
        • Pretty sure that makes the existing AI researchers think they could make a lot by leaving for somewhere else
      • Facebook being quite far behind in AI
      • Yann LeCun (rightly, in my opinion) thinking LLMs have hit a wall and AGI (Artificial General Intelligence) is not going to happen via LLMs
        • It’s very interesting that all the researchers in AI think AGI is not imminent and feel that LLMs are not the path to AGI
        • Meanwhile, all the startups CTOs and CEOs are promising AGI within 1 to 3 years, and are pretending LLMs will make that happen
      • Alexander Wang, a college dropout with almost no actual AI research expertise, being made head of AI at Facebook
        • Researchers find it hard to respect someone without a quality education
        • Even PhDs would find it hard to work under someone like Wang who has no actual AI expertise. Imagine telling one of the Godfathers of AI that his new boss is a Dude who is good at outsourcing data labeling jobs
    4. For anyone with even basic knowledge of Neural Networks, Machine Learning, Computer Science, it is pretty clear that Machine Learning is very unlikely to be The Path to Artificial General Intelligence.
      • Ditto for Super Intelligence – LLMs are extremely unlikely to lead us to either AGI or Super Intelligence
        • You can’t just Brute Force AGI
      • The fact that the AI Bubble is pushing LLMs and massive investment into LLMs as ‘the one true path’ has got to be vexing for one of the Godfathers of AI
    5. Fundamentally, there is always a clash between the actual researchers in a field, and the ‘exploiters’ who want to commercialize the technology
      • That is perhaps why we are seeing a lot of the serious AI researchers shifting to companies such as Safe Super Intelligence (Ilya) and Thinking Machines Lab (Mira Murati)
      • It should be very unsurprising that Yann LeCun is leaving Facebook.
      • Prof. Hinton left Google in 2023 and we will see nearly all the big AI researchers leave the ‘exploiter’ companies for actual AI research labs or companies that have an extremely strong moral compass

    It’s going to be very interesting to see what happens at Facebook. Meta/Facebook has survived by buying Instagram right before it blew up (for $1 Billion) and Whatsapp after it became big (for $19 Billion). It has also done a good job of cloning successful companies and moving fast.

    Without smart acquisitions (especially Instagram and Whatsapp) and fast ‘stealing of ideas’/cloning Facebook aka Meta would be gone. Now with AI Facebook aka Meta faces another existential crisis.

    AI presents a Huge challenge to the large technology companies.

    OpenAI and Anthropic are of a size and potential where Mark Zuckerberg or Jeff Bezos or Elon Musk cannot just buy them. So the strategy (which I discuss in a separate post) is to just acquire as many ultra talented AI researchers as they can, and hope magic happens.

    Zuckerberg is doing this with Facebook AI Labs/Meta AI Labs.

    Elon Musk is doing this with xAI.

    Bezos is doing this with Prometheus AI.

    Seeing one of the Godfathers of AI walk away from Facebook is a stark reminder of how difficult it is for the large technology companies to navigate AI. Your most valuable assets are walking away and even $100 million a year salaries are not enough to keep them.

  • Elon Musk’s xAI raising $15 Billion at a $230 Billion Valuation

    November 19th, 2025

    Another Day. Another Crazy Valuation.

    xAI, which was valued at $113 Billion in March 2025 when it merged with X (Twitter), is now raising $15 Billion at a $230 Billion valuation.

    Reference: https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/elon-musks-xai-in-advanced-talks-to-raise-15-billion-lifting-valuation-00bcfa80?

    WSJ says xAI is burning cash rapidly, as it works to improve Grok.

    WSJ Article -> Exclusive | Elon Musk’s xAI Is in Advanced Talks to Raise $15 Billion, Lifting Valuation – WSJ

    Elon Musk has denied the fundraising on Twitter/X.

1 2 3 … 6
Next Page→

Blog at WordPress.com.

Loading Comments...

    • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Deal AI - Deals, Funding, Acquisitions & Mergers in AI
      • Already have a WordPress.com account? Log in now.
      • Deal AI - Deals, Funding, Acquisitions & Mergers in AI
      • Subscribe Subscribed
      • Sign up
      • Log in
      • Report this content
      • View site in Reader
      • Manage subscriptions
      • Collapse this bar